(Articles Chosen: Sumner and Kataoka, Sumner, King and
Sumner)
The three articles authored or co-authored by Sumner all
dealt with the topic of variation in phonetic information and how differences
in speech production – between individuals and between entire accented
populations – can influence recognition.
Sumner and Kataoka studied participants who had to recall
and recognize words produced by speakers falling into different categories of
accented English: General American (GA), New York City (NYC), and Southern
Standard British English (BE). The study found that speakers of GA recalled and
recognized the words of GA and BE speakers with minimal difference. The
researchers suggest then that frequency may not be the best indicator of how
humans internalize phonetic events, and that less frequent, but more emphasized,
experiences of linguistic events become socially weighted and result in
similarly robust representations.
The discussion of social weight continues in Sumner’s 2015
article, which opens talking about just how variable and multi-faceted speech
production is, and how the nuances relay valuable information about the
speaker. The listener then encodes differently – consciously or unconsciously –
the words of the speaker based on this perceived phonetic information, causing
phenomena in which a listener may only be able to remember the gist of the
words and not the words verbatim because of their subjective experience with
the linguistic cues – social cues that are activated earlier than one might
like and have discriminatory consequences.
King and Sumner continued to study the variation in speech
production through free association and semantic priming, looking at the role
of phonetic information specific to individual speakers in listener interpretation
and how variation in speech cues word recognition, finding that single words
prompt significant differences in responses between two speakers that vary in age,
race, and gender.
Your question about whether there's an "optimal" voice for professors to have to maximize retention by students makes me think about the common student complaints about professors for whom English is not a first language. Often, students perceive their teaching to have less clarity than that of a native English speaker. However, I've come to notice that aside from their slight accents, the vast majority of such professors are as clear in their explanations as other professors. Perhaps the onus then lies on us as students to pay closer attention in lectures?
ReplyDeleteOne area that would be interesting to explore your question about
ReplyDeleteoptimal voice and its influence on learning would be analyzing the speakers in audiobooks. While I do not use audiobooks, I am curious to how the speaker is chosen and whether the speaker affects learning (such as memory) when using educational audiobooks.