In Dr. Sumner’s paper on
discrimination and accent-differences, I found her comment about listening to
the physicist lecture particularly interesting. This idea of social weighting
fascinates me—how our ability to relate to a speaker or our assumed “prestige”
of the speaker actually changes our auditory processing of the speech event.
This immediately strikes me as a very socially ingrained form of classism,
racism, and prejudice. One of the most interesting biases that arises with
accents is the assumption that so many American people make that Southern
Standard British English speakers are more intelligent and more
prestigious—something I find fascinating give our history of declaring
independence from Britain. I wonder if this same prestigious bias existed
earlier in American history and British English was favored over the American
accent.
Listeners’ ability to understand
spoken words given massive variation in pronunciation is quite amazing. It
reminds me of how given different lighting and shadows, humans can still
identify accurate colors, even though the actual variation in colors being seen
is massive (for example: on a white wall with gray shadows), and understand
that the wall is continuously white. In the Sumner and Kataoka study, the
researchers found that native GA speakers recalled spoken words from
within-accent voices and British English voices at approximately the same rate,
but false recalled spoken words (as in thought words had been spoken that had
not been) for NYC-accent speakers about 50% more often than with the other two
accents. I think it’s interesting that gist-encoding is modulated by a lack of
attention, and that this could be the reason that the participants paid more
attention to the within-accent speakers as well at the British English
speakers. It’s striking that we’ve somehow become so conditioned to be
attentive to British English over other accents, and I really want to know more
about this sociolinguistic phenomenon. I personally find myself wildly attracted
to people with British accents.
The King and Sumner paper focuses
on semantic differences in interpretation of different speakers. The
researchers used a word association task to understand if different speakers
trigger different responses in word association tasks based on varying vocal
characteristic differences. The fact that people respond in different ways to
spoken words depending on vocal characteristics of the speaker is so
fascinating to me, and continues the thread throughout these assigned papers
that the characteristics we can gather about someone based on their voice
changes the way we process the information, which has some potentially very discriminatory
implications. I will now think twice about fawning over British accents in the
future, because I know about our subconscious bias to certain accents and
other vocal characteristics and how they affect our assumptions about the
speaker.
I too am interested in this idea of socially favored speech patterns, and the harmful implications it has for immigrants and those with accents perceived to be "less prestigious." It's very damaging to think about in terms of hiring processes, interviews, and the like, where people with "unfavored" accents already suffer discrimination.
ReplyDelete