In Thursday’s class, we read an experimental setup from
Lev-Ari and Keysar (2010). They conclude that comprehension difficulty is
inversely proportional to trustfulness for speakers rated by listeners. There
is no connection between the voice characteristics of a speaker and
comprehension difficulty. Listeners tend to make their judgement after the
process of understanding is finished.
However, this week’s readings reveal to us that the voice
characteristics of a speaker, cueing the speaker’s social attributes (such as age,
gender, race, etc.), have impact on listeners’ understanding the speech. Sumner
(2015) points out that listeners start to process the information of the
speaker’s social attributes even before they process the words spoken by the
speaker. Although it might help listeners better understand the speech, this
“early access to social representations” easily leads to listeners’ biases,
thus creates difficulty in listeners’ attention to the speech.
Sumner & Kataoka (2013) study that how phonetic
variation influence semantic encoding in word recognition and recalling. They
suggest that frequency may not be the only factor that lead to strong encoding;
the social weighting, contained in phonetic variation, also plays a significant
role in the word recognition process.
King & Sumner (2015) investigate the effect of
speaker-specific phonetic cues on how listeners interpret the words spoken by
the speaker. They conclude that listeners tend to have different responses to
the same word spoken by different speakers with different voice
characteristics, cueing their age, race, gender, etc.
We can find many
examples in our lives to prove the conclusion stated in this week’s readings. Take
my experience of learning English as an example. Listening comprehension is
essential for foreign students in their English learning. We need to listen to
a variety of recordings from time to time. I like listening to TED talks every
day. As we know, not every presenter is English native speaker in TED talks.
Every time I hear a voice that has a strong accent, I will label it as “non-English
native speaker” and tend to skip the talk. A strong feeling usually comes to my
mind at the beginning of the speech that this speech is very difficult to understand.
This example proves that the process of social information is even before the
process of the word recognition. Also, consider the following sentence, “I have
not done nothing wrong in my life.” If this sentence is spoken in a very young
voice (it gives a cue that the speaker is a child), we tend to feel
uncomfortable. It also takes more time for us to process the meaning, compared
to the situation that it is spoken by an old voice. Why? Because the very young
voice gives us an expectation that the speaker doesn’t have much experience.
The conflict between the sentence’s meaning and the expectation from the cues
given by the very young voice delay the processing of the meaning.
In the future,
I would like to know more about how word processing is related to the voice
characteristics, such as age, race and gender. In addition, a voice contains a
variety of characteristics. Which characteristic plays a more significant role
in the word processing? Is it influenced by the context?
No comments:
Post a Comment