This week’s
selections, Unequal Partnership by
Rickford and The Paradox of the Universal
Triangle by Lupyan, introduce two very separate subjects: in Rickford, we
learn about the contributions AAVE has made to modern linguistics, or rather
the contributions which linguists have been able to make only thanks to AAVE;
in Lupyan, we learn about the role language plays in prototyping and state
relationships in our cognitive neural state space.
I found
Rickford’s look into AAVE particularly interesting when he describes
grammaticalization, the process by which a semantic element is incorporated
into the syntax of a language, and stylistic variation, for the variability of
which the preferred explanation seems to lie in varying the speaker’s audience –
a speaker will change the way s/he speaks based on the environment (e.g. individual
vs peer interviews).
It would be
interesting to investigate which parts of speech allow for the influx of any
new syntactically significant terms, as well as which parts of speech are
contenders to be chosen for such a role.
This notion
of impressions also brings to mind what Rickford says about the failure of Bridge.
I completely understand why many in the African-American community were less
than pleased with the program. Because AAVE is so stigmatized against the
traditionally correct SE, it seems a patronizing attempt to guide urban youth away
from the dialect every inner city, Black child may have been exposed to, which
understandably fails to garner much sympathy from a decent number of
African-American intellectuals. Even with statistical support for its methods,
Bridge was fighting an uphill battle, which is why the rules Rickford outlines
to guide effective service should be followed in the field.
My father
is half Native-Hawaiian and roughly half Chinese, was born and raised on the
island of Oahu, and as such grew up hearing and speaking an English heavily
influenced by Hawaiian Pidgin English. He left Hawai’i to study at the
University of Washington, and there was able to develop for himself a more polished
Standard English. Now, I would say he is fluently bidialectal, as he has been
for many years, and as is evident whenever we as a family visit Hawai’i – he switches
between one and the other depending on whom he is speaking with. Friend’s from
high school? Non-standard dialect. Tourists and people from the mainland?
Standard dialect.
Lupyan
determines that only with language are we able to render certain abstract
concepts as distinct from specific instances of each concept. A triangle is
different from a three sided figure even though the two describe the same constraints
imposed on a geometric shape. This parallels an interesting observation in
semantics, where the logical equivalent of one expression gives off certain
differentiable connotations.
I agree with your statement of how and why Bridge fought an "uphill battle," especially considering how African American leaders who opposed Bridge "mistakenly thought that the aim was to teach Ebonics and not standard English."
ReplyDeleteI also enjoyed your anecdote about your father! It reminds me of my freshman year RA, who's from the Caribbean. People joke that he speaks in an American accent until he's talking about anything Caribbean-related, in which case he automatically switches to his Caribbean accent.