How could
Linguistics ever have been thought of as something for the Humanities? It has
the same aim as physics--to take something you intuitively understood and to
complicate it so much you question whether you ever knew it at all. Last week's
readings were fine. I never claimed to have an understanding of my body. I'm no
biologist. I'm no doctor. But Language? I use it every day. I talk to friends,
I write essays, hell, I even think using
Language. How could I not understand it? It's not like I didn't know the rules
of grammar, how could that not be enough? What more could I learn about my
language? That question is yet to be answered, but it turns out there is a lot
I can learn about capital-L Language. For starters, I learned a bit about
syntax, more than just basic grammar dictated. I learned about how it is
decided. I never really thought about why I knew what syntax was correct, but
as Chapter 1 Section 9 predicted, I have no clue why "Who do you wonder
what bought?" sounds like an alien language. It's not just the grammar
rules. It seems to be something more. That's just not how you would begin to
generate a sentence. Parts of speech was up next, and this was something I had
at least thought about before. Of course, I know what part of speech a word is.
What could there be to learn? But as always, my question isn't answered with an
answer, but with a question: why do I know Language as well as I do? And
whether it is Syntax, Parts of Speech, or Constituency, my previous answer of
school and intuition prove to not be enough. But there is hope! Much like
physics doesn't just leave you hanging, Linguistics does provide some answers
to. The night is always darkest before the dawn, and sometimes you have to move
backwards to go forwards. At least now when people ask me what noun my
adjective applies to, I can draw them a nice tree structure.
No comments:
Post a Comment