Chapter one of
the textbook outlines all the basics of speech. Gussenhoven and Kenstowicz explain
how the lungs, larynx, and vocal tract all work together to form segments of
sound that make up language. When thinking of speech, I always felt as if every
letter had a sound and words were made up of these various sounds. I knew that
there were silent letters in words but this is different from voiceless. For
example, the ‘u’ in guard is silent but the [st] in stay is voiceless. These
are entirely different concepts. How do linguistics view ‘silent’ letters and are
they even silent at all? Voiceless letters, though they do not make a sound,
are still ‘heard’ by others. We still know the person is saying the [st] but we
do not actually hear anything. This is interesting and I wonder if I say words
like “say” and simply pause after or elongate the ‘s’ would people think I said
“stay.” Silent and voiceless letters make it harder for foreign learners. The
authors also spoke about syllables and when they are stressed. Stress is
another obstacle for language learners. English is left dominant but not all
other languages are; perhaps this makes it difficult to construe each
individual word. It is also interesting to think about how humans learned to stress
certain parts of words. Language is very dynamic and pronunciations change over
time. Why do we stress some syllables rather than others? When we learn new
words we may often pronounce them incorrectly due to unfamiliarity of the
stress. However, the words we do know and have used for years we do not
question stress. This makes it difficult to learn languages because one may be
saying all the correct words but stressing the incorrect syllable making the
string of words incomprehensible.
Chapter two steers away from the
anatomical aspect of speech and begins to explain sounds themselves. He speaks
of letters having different variations but having the same underlying sound. These
variants actually come from systematic rules that modify the letter depending
on context. The biggest thing I took away from this reading is that we, as
speakers of a common language, follow these rules. English speakers follow the
rules but we do not know what they exactly entail and we also do not know how
we know them. This should then make it difficult to teach people a language. It
forces learners to learn through trial and error and slows the process down. If
it were easy to define all of these “systematic rules,” new speakers could then
learn to make these new sounds correctly. This reading made me think about
language acquisition and gave me a new perspective on speech. It seems that
learning to speak would be very difficult given all of these rules and relevant
body parts. Why is it so easy to speak and learn new words and languages?
No comments:
Post a Comment