The excerpt from Gussenhoven describes the anatomy of the mechanical
and vocal processes that render possible the phonetic intricacies and
complications Kenstowicz brings up. From the overwhelming list of variable
mechanisms that Gussenhoven details, it becomes clear the reasons for the
existence of so many nuances in different languages addressed in Kenstowicz’s
piece and validates the ultimate question of how one goes about representing
and assigning a universal, cohesive notation system.
In his general overview of language production, Gussenhoven
enumerates the intricacies involved in vowel production, the different types of
phonation, how pitch becomes a distinguishing factor and the role of stress on
meaning. He describes the anatomical vocabulary of procedures for producing
differing phonemes, categorizes and provides examples for plosives, fricatives,
sonorants, etc., and includes how devoicing and aspiration play a role in production of
sounds.
Kenstowicz narrows in on this idea of a phoneme and suggests
that the variation among different languages makes it difficult to standardize
representations. Additionally, he mentions that individual letters in words
might be perceived as a certain sound, but are actually not being produced at
all, giving the example of “tents” vs. “tends” in which the listener wants to
perceive five sounds, but in reality only four are being produced.
As a singer, what I found to be interesting was Kenstowicz’s
indication that the voicing of a final consonant only differs because of a
nuance in the length of the preceding vowel, that in “rib” versus “rip,” the
difference comes not from the final consonant, but from the length of production of the
vowel (fascinating!). This made me consider the implications in music, for often,
understanding a word that is sustained on a long note is dependent on how clear
the final consonant is. Perhaps, with this knowledge, a lyricist might decide that some
words more conducive to long notes while the vowel of others should remain shorter
for the purpose of lyrical comprehension.
Excellent observations, Arjun! As a singer myself, I have noticed that it is much harder to communicate certain lyrics over others, but I had never considered that the problem could be rooted in phonology. It totally makes sense, though. Have you considered how phonology affects onsets as well? I've been wondering if it's a problem restricted to singing, or if the process of unifying breath for onset extend to regular conversation as well.
ReplyDelete